Beneath the Red Hood.

Campaign Case Study

Posted on by TJ Tee

Together with a client of ours, a campaign was recently launched where members of the public vote for one lucky couple to win a sponsored event worth RM100,000. The contest involved 4 phases of public voting, blogging, video streaming, picture galleries and mini contests, culminating in the selection of the winning couple and an event of their dreams.

Integricity was privileged to be part of the experience, and was involved throughout the entire campaign – from logo conceptualization to suggestions on contest mechanics to execution and marketing of the website. Working closely with the client, Integricity developed a solid online marketing strategy which involved creating a social network presence on Facebook and video on YouTube.

Facebook was the platform of choice, as it allowed Integricity to fully leverage its viral marketing capabilities. It was also the fastest growing online community, even though Friendster was the most popular social network in Malaysia at the time (Facebook has since usurped Friendster from the top spot).

Their Facebook Fan Page enabled the client to garner online support, and Integricity worked hand-in-hand to manage and grow the community. Audience engagement was an important element of the Fan Page – member-brand/member-member interactions helped to build affinity towards the brand and fans could spread the word easily, notifying their friends on latest contest updates by channeling traffic to the Fan Page. The couples’ blogs were also integrated with the Fan Page via RSS, allowing updates from contestants to reach the fan base almost instantly.

Facebook’s audience targeting feature was also highly valuable, and enabled Integricity to cater campaign ads to its target audience – 21-35 year old Malaysian and Singaporean women who were in a relationship or were engaged (Users who did not meet the criteria were not shown the ad). This allowed the message to reach its target audience quickly in a cost-effective manner. The ads were also combined with the Fan Page (a feature Facebook calls “social ads”) which produced higher resonance and trust with the crowd.

The results of the strategy were highly successful

•    Over 3 million ad impressions (0.11% CTR) •    More than 500 contest entries •    Over 1 million total votes (122356 votes for the winning couple) •    More than 1,000 fans on Facebook •    Over 20,000 video views on YouTube •    Over 850,000 page views (23564 unique visitors)

Final statistics of the campaign. Note that the fans are extremely targeted ones.

Within the first few hours of launching the targeted ad, there were already about 5,000 ad impression views, with a hundred or so click-thrus.

This campaign was a groundbreaking endeavour that was rewarded with high user engagement and stronger brand affinity. What was even more remarkable was that the campaign was produced on a limited budget (media buy was limited to a 2 week print campaign in The Sun newspaper). Much of the contest activity was Web-driven – a strategy that paid handsomely for our client.

* The client for this campaign has requested to remain anonymous.

This entry was posted in Blog, Current Projects, Social Media and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Campaign Case Study

  1. Nice work with this. Glad to see a relevant case study. More marketeers should follow this path of info sharing.

    Curious to know: how did Berjaya quantify / measure the RoI for this project? Any commercial benefits?

  2. Hey Praveen, always glad to share knowledge :)

    As with all contests, campaign performance was based on number of entries and we managed to surpass the targets set with the client. It’s the first time BHR is running this, so we didn’t really have a benchmark we could use.

    Commercially, the aim was to market Berjaya properties as wedding destinations – an angle that was unexplored previously. Judging by the contest response, I think the campaign managed to associate brand and wedding elements quite successfully. We’re certainly looking forward to having more wedding venue bookings at Berjaya as a result of this campaign!

  3. Don’t forget the use of blogs/advertorials in this campaign :)

  4. wow what a great campaign funny how come it said that it was an in house team in The Star is there a mistake? The article link is here http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2009/5/8/central/3830278&sec=central
    Any ideas?

  5. Hi. I noticed you used my photograph I found using TinEye.com without crediting as your case study image. Do note that the photograph use is an infringement of copyrights.

    Thank you.

  6. If you have done all the hard work, definitely credit is due. Show them the PO and ask them in which part in this blog entry that was incorrectly written.

    Is there any NDA signed?

    If you are on the right side, nothing to fear.

  7. Dear Evan,

    On behalf of Integricity, we do apologise and assure you that it was never our intention to leave out the credits. We would never do so, as there we believe in attributing full credit where due.

    Should you prefer for us to remove the image, please let me know. I have personally contacted you via email and phone to let you know we will do as you request. In the interim, we have added your credit to the bottom of the image.

    Once again, I do apologise for the oversight.

    Alex Lam
    Managing Director
    Integricity Corporation Sdn Bhd

  8. From the Star report, it sounds like they not only conveniently forgot your contribution to the campaign, but claimed that they did it all by themselves. That’s not very nice, is it?

    Next thing you know they’ll be claiming they single-handedly made the winners Kimberly and Kelvin fall in love. Maybe they’ll even take full credit for their firstborn. Heh.

  9. Wow bad form on Berjaya Hotels & Resorts. Shame on Thang Han-Ni. Why stress “execute only through in-house resources”?

    Is there recourse by writing to The Star? Definitely fire them as clients.

  10. I always believe that we must give credit where credit is due. It hurts when they didn’t credit you. It hurts even more when they claim they ALL the credits for a successful campaign.

    *SIGH*

  11. Dear Evan,

    As per your recent email request, we have since removed your image from this blog post.

  12. I stumbled across this and I was totally shocked to see the discrepancies between what it was published in the paper and actually happened.

    The main assumption I made is definitely that the so called marketing manager (Thang Han-Ni) wanted more “fame” and “limelight” to herself to prove that she could have done all of this.

    Definitely very bad PR by Berjaya because of a rotten apple. I do hope that they clarify this and clear the air over these things.

    Sort of reminds me of this article instead (http://bit.ly/tDkGT)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>